| Code | Warband | # | VP | CP | Infl |
| SoR | Sisters of Redemption | 4 | -1 | 4 | 1 |
| IL | Irontusk Ladz | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| BG | Brothers Grimm* | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| FS | Fortune Seekers | 2 | 4 | 2 | 5 |
| R&T | Rough 'n' Tumble | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Ka | Kaledorians | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| GG | Gunther's Gravediggers | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| SK | Shizz Kebabb | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| MEG | Malal’s Elite Guard | 1 | -1 | 0 | 7 |
07 June 2007
Campaign update (after turn 7)
The Victory point and campaign point ratings thus far (supplied by our Game master on June 7, 2007). Warbands are shown starting with highest total of Campaign points, then highest total Victory points and finally least number of fights as a tie breaker:
* this warband now calls itself 'The Grimm Martyrs', but the old name will be used in these records for ease of recognition.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Damn Sisters, lost three battles in a row and still on top. We'll see about that, though.. ;-)
They are the only ones who have secured a Title though, namely 'Bruiser'. Do I detect some jealousy from the orcish camp?
I showed those Orc`s why we sisters are on top this evening. even though it gave my famous old geezer an hearth attack to finaly see the rock he was supposed to guide us to.
5 dead henchman, by Gork! And no wyrdstone ta show fer it, neither.
I think a "minimum of one wyrdstone per post-battle sequence" would be good, though. In this particular instance, it's almost the difference between a viable warband and a group of beggars.
Yep, that Common Neighborhood (-1 wyrdstone in post-battle sequence) is a worthless piece of crappy real estate. I plan to never go there again if I can possibly help it!
Post a Comment